From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 21:48:09 +0200 From: Florian Westphal Message-ID: <20190903194809.GD13660@breakpoint.cc> References: <20190830181354.26279-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com> <20190830181354.26279-2-leonardo@linux.ibm.com> <20190830205802.GS20113@breakpoint.cc> <99e3ef9c5ead1c95df697d49ab9cc83a95b0ac7c.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190903164948.kuvtpy7viqhcmp77@salvia> <20190903170550.GA13660@breakpoint.cc> <20190903193155.v74ws47zcn6zrwpr@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190903193155.v74ws47zcn6zrwpr@salvia> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v4 1/2] netfilter: Terminate rule eval if protocol=IPv6 and ipv6 module is disabled List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, Florian Westphal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jozsef Kadlecsik , coreteam@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Leonardo Bras , "David S. Miller" Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > I was expecting we could find a way to handle this from br_netfilter > > > alone itself. > > > > We can't because we support ipv6 fib lookups from the netdev family > > as well. > > > > Alternative is to auto-accept ipv6 packets from the nf_tables eval loop, > > but I think its worse. > > Could we add a restriction for nf_tables + br_netfilter + !ipv6. I > mean, if this is an IPv6 packet, nf_tables is on and IPv6 module if > off, then drop this packet? We could do that from nft_do_chain_netdev().