From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1603097558; x=1634633558; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=tJ/a1JvUOjBjoPtEuJeWoMkuf2rsk+6hMQF3y1Sz3mw=; b=qMeEnYvdXeZAw3yedp76hOAh+rTbpXp+oJIsZnoDFSWkwqF4xEGevHO3 87cxwYnGZ2CD69MSj0SZEJaaW0JMiLh/NXhjltZrZK3jl6VCrEJrHYfr9 73RkfI9FyWY/IWdwSyxZuBJtZ2B5vrq3WpOBwxJ3M8yr2tWpY6dmKqbJf 3OmIgJnE1YDFczeB4XjcgkjPrB6ohVUWYGv2G/E55gDi7qkaB32/jdMWV 5g77R7WZLeX81wpsENGe6Tr60uTNUpQj5P4JmMM/ZwJU68pX0TZqVqE4P S05IP+8RvDYgUVPbNZU1OdIZ6OyHAlFVvPKreRff7BHqRG9B9p8sSaQcj Q==; Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:51:04 +0000 From: Henrik Bjoernlund Message-ID: <20201019085104.2hkz2za2o2juliab@soft-test08> References: <20201015115418.2711454-1-henrik.bjoernlund@microchip.com> <20201015115418.2711454-8-henrik.bjoernlund@microchip.com> <20201015103431.25d66c8b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201015103431.25d66c8b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v6 07/10] bridge: cfm: Netlink SET configuration Interface. List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, idosch@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com, nikolay@nvidia.com, roopa@nvidia.com, Horatiu Vultur , davem@davemloft.net Thank you for the review. Comments below. The 10/15/2020 10:34, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:54:15 +0000 Henrik Bjoernlund wrote: > > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_MEP_CONFIG_MDLEVEL] = { > > + .type = NLA_U32, .validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_MAX, .max = 7 }, > > NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_U32, 7) I will change as requested. > > Also why did you keep the validation in the code in patch 4? In patch 4 there is no CFM NETLINK so I desided to keep the validation in the code until NETLINK was added that is now doing the check. I this a problem? -- /Henrik