From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org F01BE4032A DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 9D8A9400D9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666311073; bh=EDmrggTVBt4ZmieCGYNTkKBhUVVBHvuFF8t6Ohb5odY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hXy7QnVya8WFHGkF23bCrlzbszdMIq30gtS5sC/AzLAN0UyIikoDL+dGHWiX3sOJx 52Tra3Fs2j1AtumjbHs5IZaj1DXx+8kqp+MZQaFa5KMfEMRHjrqXtzFmcG3St3vajw vn19PU1YUp6Z8HqgEtJjF4vExJm+FQJxfb5H2BNy5KAjVRyZ1IPZjxgspl3wecF+5W Lz3nMgwm+OBkBF1XVr3XerHIv6ORrYZBTUuWXQFWkKBf8+yJ418REFRkxWPkPh00Zc c0ekgpx1lIBlABhf9vH5VdHTkphiAxThbg/MHqo8+4NIpzHVSY1BDl8Ax/GpkOYPZV gU9WNCggZUhaw== Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:11:11 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski Message-ID: <20221020171111.0cc66047@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1c71e62ee5d6c0a7fc54d3e666aca619@kapio-technology.com> References: <20221018165619.134535-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20221018165619.134535-2-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <1c71e62ee5d6c0a7fc54d3e666aca619@kapio-technology.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v8 net-next 01/12] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag to extend locked port feature List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: netdev@kapio-technology.com Cc: Andrew Lunn , Alexandre Belloni , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Kurt Kanzenbach , Eric Dumazet , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Joachim Wiberg , Shuah Khan , Ivan Vecera , Florian Fainelli , Daniel Borkmann , Florent Fourcot , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ido Schimmel , Paolo Abeni , Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh , Landen Chao , Sean Wang , Jiri Pirko , Amit Cohen , Christian Marangi , Hauke Mehrtens , Hans Schultz , Roopa Prabhu , DENG Qingfang , Claudiu Manoil , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Yuwei Wang , Petr Machata , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vladimir Oltean , davem@davemloft.net On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 21:37:17 +0200 netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote: > Okay, since Jakub says that this patch set must be resent, the question > remains to me if I shall make these changes and resend the patch set > as v8? If I understand the question right - since you'd be making changes the new posting should be a v9. If you got only acks and no change requests for this posting you could repost as "v8 RESEND", or also as v9, when in doubt err on the side of bumping the version...