From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: mlxsw@nvidia.com, razor@blackwall.org,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
edumazet@google.com, roopa@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 02/14] bridge: mcast: Split (*, G) and (S, G) addition into different functions
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:28:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221208152839.1016350-3-idosch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221208152839.1016350-1-idosch@nvidia.com>
When the bridge is using IGMP version 3 or MLD version 2, it handles the
addition of (*, G) and (S, G) entries differently.
When a new (S, G) port group entry is added, all the (*, G) EXCLUDE
ports need to be added to the port group of the new entry. Similarly,
when a new (*, G) EXCLUDE port group entry is added, the port needs to
be added to the port group of all the matching (S, G) entries.
Subsequent patches will create more differences between both entry
types. Namely, filter mode and source list can only be specified for (*,
G) entries.
Given the current and future differences between both entry types,
handle the addition of each entry type in a different function, thereby
avoiding the creation of one complex function.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
net/bridge/br_mdb.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
index 2b6921dbdc02..e3bd2122d559 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
@@ -786,21 +786,107 @@ __br_mdb_choose_context(struct net_bridge *br,
return brmctx;
}
+static int br_mdb_add_group_sg(const struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
+ struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
+ struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
+ unsigned char flags,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
+ struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
+ unsigned long now = jiffies;
+
+ for (pp = &mp->ports;
+ (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, cfg->br)) != NULL;
+ pp = &p->next) {
+ if (p->key.port == cfg->p) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "(S, G) group is already joined by port");
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+ if ((unsigned long)p->key.port < (unsigned long)cfg->p)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ p = br_multicast_new_port_group(cfg->p, &cfg->group, *pp, flags, NULL,
+ MCAST_INCLUDE, RTPROT_STATIC);
+ if (unlikely(!p)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Couldn't allocate new (S, G) port group");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p);
+ if (!(flags & MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT))
+ mod_timer(&p->timer,
+ now + brmctx->multicast_membership_interval);
+ br_mdb_notify(cfg->br->dev, mp, p, RTM_NEWMDB);
+
+ /* All of (*, G) EXCLUDE ports need to be added to the new (S, G) for
+ * proper replication.
+ */
+ if (br_multicast_should_handle_mode(brmctx, cfg->group.proto)) {
+ struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *star_mp;
+ struct br_ip star_group;
+
+ star_group = p->key.addr;
+ memset(&star_group.src, 0, sizeof(star_group.src));
+ star_mp = br_mdb_ip_get(cfg->br, &star_group);
+ if (star_mp)
+ br_multicast_sg_add_exclude_ports(star_mp, p);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int br_mdb_add_group_star_g(const struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
+ struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
+ struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
+ unsigned char flags,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
+ struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
+ unsigned long now = jiffies;
+
+ for (pp = &mp->ports;
+ (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, cfg->br)) != NULL;
+ pp = &p->next) {
+ if (p->key.port == cfg->p) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "(*, G) group is already joined by port");
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+ if ((unsigned long)p->key.port < (unsigned long)cfg->p)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ p = br_multicast_new_port_group(cfg->p, &cfg->group, *pp, flags, NULL,
+ MCAST_EXCLUDE, RTPROT_STATIC);
+ if (unlikely(!p)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Couldn't allocate new (*, G) port group");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p);
+ if (!(flags & MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT))
+ mod_timer(&p->timer,
+ now + brmctx->multicast_membership_interval);
+ br_mdb_notify(cfg->br->dev, mp, p, RTM_NEWMDB);
+ /* If we are adding a new EXCLUDE port group (*, G), it needs to be
+ * also added to all (S, G) entries for proper replication.
+ */
+ if (br_multicast_should_handle_mode(brmctx, cfg->group.proto))
+ br_multicast_star_g_handle_mode(p, MCAST_EXCLUDE);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int br_mdb_add_group(const struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp, *star_mp;
- struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
struct br_mdb_entry *entry = cfg->entry;
struct net_bridge_port *port = cfg->p;
+ struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp;
struct net_bridge *br = cfg->br;
- struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx;
struct br_ip group = cfg->group;
- unsigned long now = jiffies;
unsigned char flags = 0;
- struct br_ip star_group;
- u8 filter_mode;
brmctx = __br_mdb_choose_context(br, entry, extack);
if (!brmctx)
@@ -823,52 +909,13 @@ static int br_mdb_add_group(const struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
return 0;
}
- for (pp = &mp->ports;
- (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, br)) != NULL;
- pp = &p->next) {
- if (p->key.port == port) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Group is already joined by port");
- return -EEXIST;
- }
- if ((unsigned long)p->key.port < (unsigned long)port)
- break;
- }
-
- filter_mode = br_multicast_is_star_g(&group) ? MCAST_EXCLUDE :
- MCAST_INCLUDE;
-
if (entry->state == MDB_PERMANENT)
flags |= MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT;
- p = br_multicast_new_port_group(port, &group, *pp, flags, NULL,
- filter_mode, RTPROT_STATIC);
- if (unlikely(!p)) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Couldn't allocate new port group");
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p);
- if (entry->state == MDB_TEMPORARY)
- mod_timer(&p->timer,
- now + brmctx->multicast_membership_interval);
- br_mdb_notify(br->dev, mp, p, RTM_NEWMDB);
- /* if we are adding a new EXCLUDE port group (*,G) it needs to be also
- * added to all S,G entries for proper replication, if we are adding
- * a new INCLUDE port (S,G) then all of *,G EXCLUDE ports need to be
- * added to it for proper replication
- */
- if (br_multicast_should_handle_mode(brmctx, group.proto)) {
- if (br_multicast_is_star_g(&group)) {
- br_multicast_star_g_handle_mode(p, filter_mode);
- } else {
- star_group = p->key.addr;
- memset(&star_group.src, 0, sizeof(star_group.src));
- star_mp = br_mdb_ip_get(br, &star_group);
- if (star_mp)
- br_multicast_sg_add_exclude_ports(star_mp, p);
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
+ if (br_multicast_is_star_g(&group))
+ return br_mdb_add_group_star_g(cfg, mp, brmctx, flags, extack);
+ else
+ return br_mdb_add_group_sg(cfg, mp, brmctx, flags, extack);
}
static int __br_mdb_add(const struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 15:28 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 00/14] bridge: mcast: Extensions for EVPN Ido Schimmel
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 01/14] bridge: mcast: Do not derive entry type from its filter mode Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:27 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-12-09 7:29 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 02/14] bridge: mcast: Split (*, G) and (S, G) addition into different functions Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 03/14] bridge: mcast: Place netlink policy before validation functions Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:30 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 04/14] bridge: mcast: Add a centralized error path Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:30 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 05/14] bridge: mcast: Expose br_multicast_new_group_src() Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:30 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 06/14] bridge: mcast: Expose __br_multicast_del_group_src() Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:31 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 07/14] bridge: mcast: Add a flag for user installed source entries Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:32 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 08/14] bridge: mcast: Avoid arming group timer when (S, G) corresponds to a source Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:32 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 09/14] bridge: mcast: Add support for (*, G) with a source list and filter mode Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:41 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-10 13:33 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 10/14] bridge: mcast: Allow user space to add " Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:52 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 11/14] bridge: mcast: Allow user space to specify MDB entry routing protocol Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 7:53 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 12/14] bridge: mcast: Support replacement of MDB port group entries Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 8:08 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-10 13:59 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 13/14] selftests: forwarding: Rename bridge_mdb test Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 8:09 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-12-08 15:28 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 14/14] selftests: forwarding: Add bridge MDB test Ido Schimmel
2022-12-09 8:09 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221208152839.1016350-3-idosch@nvidia.com \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox