bridge.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: "Yang Huajian(杨华健)" <huajianyang@asrmicro.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	"pablo@netfilter.org" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	"kadlec@netfilter.org" <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
	"razor@blackwall.org" <razor@blackwall.org>,
	"idosch@nvidia.com" <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"dsahern@kernel.org" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"coreteam@netfilter.org" <coreteam@netfilter.org>,
	"bridge@lists.linux.dev" <bridge@lists.linux.dev>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH] net: Expand headroom to send fragmented packets in bridge fragment forward
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:45:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409104525.GC17911@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a711412f54c4dc6a7d58f4fa391dc0f@exch03.asrmicro.com>

Yang Huajian(杨华健) <huajianyang@asrmicro.com> wrote:
> > if (skb_headroom(skb) < ll_rs)
> >	goto expand_headroom;
> 
> > ... but I'm not sure what the actual problem is.
> 
> Yes, your guess is correct!
> 
> Actual problem: I think it is unreasonable to directly drop skb with insufficient headroom.
> 
> > Why does this need to make a full skb copy?
> > Should that be using skb_expand_head()?
> 
> Using skb_expand_head has the same effect.
 
> > Actually, can't you just (re)use the slowpath for the skb_headroom < ll_rs case instead of adding headroom expansion?
> 
> I tested it just now, reuse the slowpath will successed.
> But maybe this change cannot resolve all cases if the netdevice really needs this headroom.

The slowpath considers headroom requirements, see ip_frag_next():

        skb2 = alloc_skb(len + state->hlen + state->ll_rs, GFP_ATOMIC);

You should wait for more feedback and then send a v2 tomorrow.

Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09  7:33 [PATCH] net: Expand headroom to send fragmented packets in bridge fragment forward Huajian Yang
2025-04-09  9:18 ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-09 10:27   ` 答复: " Yang Huajian(杨华健)
2025-04-09 10:45     ` Florian Westphal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250409104525.GC17911@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=huajianyang@asrmicro.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).