From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:15:56 +0530 (IST) From: rahul bhardwaj In-Reply-To: <49213FC5.4040001@sysnetsistemi.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1814697707-1226918756=:97611" Message-ID: <258261.97611.qm@web8808.mail.in.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Bridge] Bridge ports needlessly going through learning stage when STP is disabled List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Francesco Dolcini Cc: Stephen Hemminger , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org --0-1814697707-1226918756=:97611 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But STP is disabled on the bridge interface, then also "setfd to zero" it w= ill work? Or should I enable the STP first? With Regards=20 Rahul Bhardwaj=20 =C2=A0 --- On Mon, 17/11/08, Francesco Dolcini wrote: From: Francesco Dolcini Subject: Re: [Bridge] Bridge ports needlessly going through learning stage = when STP is disabled To: "rahul bhardwaj" Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" , bridge@lists.linux-foundat= ion.org Date: Monday, 17 November, 2008, 1:56 AM rahul bhardwaj wrote: > Is this the right behavior ? The 15 to 30 second delay before the=20 > port moves to Forwarding state can be frustrating, as you don't > expect it, and for that period of time, start to think there is > something else wrong in the network's configuration. Is there any > place in the code where I do some change to resolve this issue. At the moment the normal way to handle this is "brctl setfd $BR_DEV 0" -Francesco _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge =0A=0A=0A Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://m= essenger.yahoo.com/invite/ --0-1814697707-1226918756=:97611 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
But STP is disabled on the bridge interface, = then also "setfd to zero" it will work? Or should I enable the STP first?
With Regards

Rahul Bhardwaj

=  


--- On Mon, 17/11/08, Francesco Dolcini = <fdolcini@sysnetsistemi.it> wrote:
= Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@vyatta.com>, bridge@lists.linux-f= oundation.org
Date: Monday, 17 November, 2008, 1:56 AM

rahul=
 bhardwaj wrote:
> Is this the right behavior ? The 15 to 30 second d=
elay
 before the 
> port moves to Forwarding state can be frustrating, as =
you don't
> expect it, and for that period of time, start to think th=
ere is
> something else wrong in the network's configuration. Is ther=
e any
> place in the code where I do some change to resolve this issu=
e.

At the moment the normal way to handle this is "brctl setfd $BR_D=
EV
0"

-Francesco
_____________________________________________=
__
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://l=
ists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

=0A
Add more friends to = your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. --0-1814697707-1226918756=:97611--