Ethernet Bridge development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Butorina Lilya <lilybox@yandex.ru>
To: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Bridge] Time of topology change in root bridge
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:32:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39041263285163@webmail88.yandex.ru> (raw)

Sorry, I made mistakes in problem description:

Hi.

I have two bridges with RSTP:

     hdlc0------hdlc0
br0 |                | br1
     hdlc1------hdlc1

br0 is root bridge.

And my initial tree topology:
#rstpctl showport br0
*    hdlc0 8001 Fwd  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8001 D
*    hdlc1 8002 Fwd  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8002 D

#rstpctl showport br1
*    hdlc0 8001 Fwd 8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8002 R
*    hdlc1 8002 Blk  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8001 A


Next I break link on br1 on root port hdlc0 and get new three topology 
immedatly:
#rstpctl showport br0
*    hdlc0 8001 Dis  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8001
*    hdlc1 8002 Fwd  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8002 D

#rstpctl showport br1
*    hdlc0 8001 Dis  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8002 
*    hdlc1 8002 Fwd  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8001 R


Next I restore link. 
Here I expect that bouth bridges calculate new (initial) tree topology in 4sec.

I see expected on br1:
*    hdlc0 8001 Fwd 8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8002 R
*    hdlc1 8002 Blk  8000-00ee10022202 8000-00ee10022202 8001 A

But on root bridge br0 I see new tree topology in 30sec.
This time interval looks like STP value.

Is this correct behavior of RSTP or bug?


Thanks. 
Lilya.

             reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-12  8:32 Butorina Lilya [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-12  8:15 [Bridge] Time of topology change in root bridge Butorina Lilya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39041263285163@webmail88.yandex.ru \
    --to=lilybox@yandex.ru \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox