From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1363155744; bh=ORsVrqr9v23NqK3U23INZzvLCTscthqq0Gwgn5psW90=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=C2LiOm9gqw8eIN0gUPIbz1m61LKzIsXQO143h/2v+SSxuMWVTChB+IFVB67pj7kKS 9CYk4bVl3s6s5uLURmTRjdvBiEpHpmGck6Z110hs67IeoLA0WEfCmGgOGtCgDHlfXW RDqk6cXltiwdr3Dc5Ni25QS8tUdRSkwtdBIpcmcs= From: "\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" In-Reply-To: <1363139126-13396-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> References: <1363139126-13396-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <473541363155743@web2d.yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:22:23 +0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/4] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vlad Yasevich , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Cc: "bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org" 13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" : > The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous mode. What is the practical applications for such setup? In other words, in which cases I would want to put bridge into non-promiscuous mode and specify some uplink ports? -- wbr, Oleg. "Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself." Alan Moore.