richardvoigt@gmail.com schreef: > > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Nicolas de Pesloüan > > wrote: > > > > Ok, now we understand what you are trying to do. In particular, I > assume > the DHCP server is on the subnet of location B (or behind a router > connected on this subnet), so the expected DHCP offer will come > from the > wire interface (eth0) and definitely not from the wireless interface > (eth1). > > > > Looking at "router" in the provided diagram, plus the placement of A > and B, I am led to believe that location A is the primary network > providing DHCP and outbound access. Furthermore, Jochen was getting a > DHCP assignment over his wireless interface before he tried to enable > bridging. > > Your suggestion of configuration as a router could work. But NAT > would not if A is the primary location, because the printer would no > longer have a address visible to location A. Indeed, location A is my primary network which provides DHCP. And yes, you are correct with your last sentence. The printer should be visible for location A too :-)