From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4BE387E0.1040802@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 11:24:16 +0800 From: Cong Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100505081514.5157.83783.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <1273111530.21962.2753.camel@calx> <20100506.004457.71584133.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20100506.004457.71584133.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [v5 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Miller Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mpm@selenic.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com, gospo@redhat.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On 05/06/10 15:44, David Miller wrote: > From: Matt Mackall > Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 21:05:30 -0500 > >> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 04:11 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote: >>> V5: >>> Fix coding style problems pointed by David. >> >> Aside from my concern about the policy of disabling netpoll on >> bridges/bonds with only partial netpoll support, I don't have any >> remaining issues with this. But I'll leave it to other folks to ack the >> underlying driver bits for this series. > > Yes the partial support handling is a thorny issue. > > But this patch set makes things better than they were before, because > support over such devices didn't work at all previously. > > So I'll toss these patches into net-next-2.6, thanks everyone! Thank you, David.