From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D30078C.4030608@free.fr> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:21:32 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nicolas_de_Peslo=FCan?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D2F958D.2010203@navigue.com> In-Reply-To: <4D2F958D.2010203@navigue.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bridge] Tagged/untagged and gretap bridging question. List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jonathan Thibault Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org Le 14/01/2011 01:15, Jonathan Thibault a =E9crit : > The goal being not to see any untagged frames coming out on the local > network from remote locations and instead having them appear in specific > local vlans. > > So at the core of my questions really is this: Will bridging the > untagged portion of an interface that has vlans enabled (eth0 when > eth0.x exists) let tagged frames go through to other members of the bridg= e? In order to strictly control what goes into the bridge and what stay local,= you should have a look=20 at the ebtables command. The following thread might also be useful: http://www.mail-archive.com/bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg01269.html Nicolas.