* [Bridge] bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev
@ 2013-11-18 8:25 Ding Tianhong
2013-11-18 8:34 ` Ding Tianhong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-11-18 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger, David S. Miller, bridge, Netdev
When the following commands are executed:
brctl addbr br0
ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
rmmod bridge
The calltrace will occur:
[ 563.312114] device eth1 left promiscuous mode
[ 563.312188] br0: port 1(eth1) entered disabled state
[ 563.468190] kmem_cache_destroy bridge_fdb_cache: Slab cache still has objects
[ 563.468197] CPU: 6 PID: 6982 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G O 3.12.0-0.7-default+ #9
[ 563.468199] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
[ 563.468200] 0000000000000880 ffff88010f111e98 ffffffff814d1c92 ffff88010f111eb8
[ 563.468204] ffffffff81148efd ffff88010f111eb8 0000000000000000 ffff88010f111ec8
[ 563.468206] ffffffffa062a270 ffff88010f111ed8 ffffffffa063ac76 ffff88010f111f78
[ 563.468209] Call Trace:
[ 563.468218] [<ffffffff814d1c92>] dump_stack+0x6a/0x78
[ 563.468234] [<ffffffff81148efd>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xfd/0x100
[ 563.468242] [<ffffffffa062a270>] br_fdb_fini+0x10/0x20 [bridge]
[ 563.468247] [<ffffffffa063ac76>] br_deinit+0x4e/0x50 [bridge]
[ 563.468254] [<ffffffff810c7dc9>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x2b0
[ 563.468259] [<ffffffff814e0922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 570.377958] Bridge firewalling registered
------------------------- cut here ---------------------------
The reason is that if the bridge dev's address is changed, the
br_fdb_change_mac_address() will add new address in fdb, but when
the bridge was removed, the address entry in the fdb did not free,
the bridge_fdb_cache still has objects when destroy the cache, Fix
this by flushing the bridge address entry when removing the bridge.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
index c41d5fb..baedc32 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
@@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ void br_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
del_nbp(p);
}
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
+ fdb_delete_by_addr(br, br->dev->dev_addr, 0);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
+
del_timer_sync(&br->gc_timer);
br_sysfs_delbr(br->dev);
--
1.7.12
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bridge] bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev
2013-11-18 8:25 [Bridge] bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev Ding Tianhong
@ 2013-11-18 8:34 ` Ding Tianhong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-11-18 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger, David S. Miller, bridge, Netdev
On 2013/11/18 16:25, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> When the following commands are executed:
>
> brctl addbr br0
> ifconfig br0 hw ether <addr>
> rmmod bridge
>
> The calltrace will occur:
wrong title, miss it, please.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-18 8:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-18 8:25 [Bridge] bridge: flush br's address entry in fdb when remove the bridge dev Ding Tianhong
2013-11-18 8:34 ` Ding Tianhong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).