From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org CAEDA60E46 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org B18C760C2C MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:27:01 +0200 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com In-Reply-To: References: <5a4cfc6246f621d006af69d4d1f61ed1@kapio-technology.com> <34dd1318a878494e7ab595f8727c7d7d@kapio-technology.com> <7016ed2ce9a30537e4278e37878900d8@kapio-technology.com> Message-ID: <7dfe15571370dfb5348a3d0e5478f62c@kapio-technology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ido Schimmel Cc: Ivan Vecera , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Jiri Pirko , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu , kuba@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean , Shuah Khan , davem@davemloft.net On 2022-08-25 11:23, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> >> >> Ido, I am not so known to the selftests, so I am wondering why I don't >> see >> either check_err or check_fail fail, whichever I use, when I think >> they >> should and then they are not really checking... >> >> >> local mac=10:20:30:30:20:10 >> >> >> $MZ $h1 -t udp -a $mac -b rand >> bridge fdb show dev $swp1 | grep -q "$mac vlan 1 master br0 >> locked" >> check_err $? "MAB station move: no locked entry on first >> injection" >> >> $MZ $h2 -t udp -a $mac -b rand >> bridge fdb show dev $swp1 | grep -q "$mac vlan 1 master br0 >> locked" >> check_err $? "MAB station move: locked entry did not move" >> >> What is wrong here? > > Did you try adding a sleep between mausezahn and the FDB dump? At least > that is what learning_test() is doing. It is possible that the packet > is > not sent / processed fast enough for the bridge to learn it before the > dump. > I missed the call to log_test at the end of the test. >> >> For a mv88e6xxx test I guess I can make a check to verify that this >> driver >> is in use? > > Not in a generic forwarding test. Maybe in > tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/dsa/ > > My preference would be to get as much tests as possible in > tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh. I now have a roaming test in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh, but it will not pass with mv88e6xxx as it is meant for the SW bridge. I can check if the sticky flag is set on the locked entry and then skip the test if it is. The bridge_locked_port.sh test is linked in tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/dsa/, but if I cannot check if the mv88e6xxx driver or other switchcores are in use, I cannot do more. > > I'm not sure which tests you are planning for mv88e6xxx, but we can > pass > / fail test cases based on the flags we observe in the FDB dump. For > example, if the entry has the "sticky" flag, then the expectation is > that the roaming test will fail. Otherwise, it should pass.