From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 9518E40167 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 0F51F400F2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:14:59 +0200 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com In-Reply-To: References: <2967ccc234bb672f5440a4b175b73768@kapio-technology.com> <9e1a9eb218bbaa0d36cb98ff5d4b97d7@kapio-technology.com> <69db7606896c77924c11a6c175c4b1a6@kapio-technology.com> <5cee059b65f6f7671e099150f9da79c1@kapio-technology.com> Message-ID: <8dfc9b525f084fa5ad55019f4418a35e@kapio-technology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ido Schimmel Cc: Andrew Lunn , Alexandre Belloni , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Kurt Kanzenbach , Eric Dumazet , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Ivan Vecera , Florian Fainelli , Daniel Borkmann , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Roopa Prabhu , kuba@kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh , Landen Chao , Jiri Pirko , Christian Marangi , Hauke Mehrtens , Sean Wang , DENG Qingfang , Claudiu Manoil , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Yuwei Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vladimir Oltean , davem@davemloft.net On 2022-09-08 09:59, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:10:07PM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com > wrote: >> I am at the blackhole driver implementation now, as I suppose that the >> iproute2 command should work with the mv88e6xxx driver when adding >> blackhole >> entries (with a added selftest)? >> I decided to add the blackhole feature as new ops for drivers with >> functions >> blackhole_fdb_add() and blackhole_fdb_del(). Do you agree with that >> approach? > > I assume you are talking about extending 'dsa_switch_ops'? Yes, that is the idea. > If so, it's up to the DSA maintainers to decide.