From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <DCFB0C9FA9884224936EBAEC97D6FD0A@vpn.com>
References: <DBB171FED24842C6AB5F4ECCA91302D2@vpn.com>
	<20080618073354.371e7fbd@catlap>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:02:32 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "c.j" <c.james.cj@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] kernel doesn't support  bridge with a ppp interface ?
Reply-To: "c.j" <C.James.CJ@gmail.com>
List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging <bridge.lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>, 
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge>, 
	<mailto:bridge-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@piasta.pl>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org


> You can setup a tunnel with OpenVPN. You'd get a tap device on
> both sides which can be bridged with eth.
Thanks. But maybe we don't want OpenVPN for VPN. Now I can't get why kernel
do not support that. Have some disadvantages?

Reg&Tks

--
c.j