From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org EA86C60BDB DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4D1AB60BB9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674992637; bh=TDNIdzHxTsptTuCNlpFYNF7gjfmaOn0rB2AsJX19J5k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hOvSM4U1AJ7KK7hjfc/3LvNG/jlgHahNGjAbnGFqR6QKun/rCMcZr6mXMoXqgtEp1 mIYGz2skNQJ/bUDvrxqGJsGk8gOukVsHq52r9i3vOZJ2EJDQoCsaIcLieHxOUf8OcC 1yLqrgt8gC98ZSNqxQUhp6WOeTQIFcMV9FEf3bWliBJo4yUij5k9kqiymP89vayMpV 62MXB7TfSvuGBHZFijK+dMsQ4ZqwP/KOhXO3Q98lMRL/ZS3S+y7fE2UP9VHR/DI+4r MujKSToQUXOktj9Qy+dEE7dEfbak6b7ltI1TLwxcr42tlREZiZyG4vkbTzRwKmFpl7 YikMf3b9QUg0w== Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:43:53 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky Message-ID: References: <2919eb55e2e9b92265a3ba600afc8137a901ae5f.1674760340.git.leon@kernel.org> <20230126223213.riq6i2gdztwuinwi@skbuf> <20230126143723.7593ce0b@kernel.org> <20230126232615.1901128c@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230126232615.1901128c@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] netlink: provide an ability to set default extack message List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, Eric Dumazet , Roopa Prabhu , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , "David S . Miller" On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:26:15PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:26:13 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > That'd be my preference too, FWIW. It's only the offload cases which > > > need this sort of fallback. > > > > Of course not, almost any error unwind path which sets extack will need it. > > I guess we can come up with scenarios where the new behavior would > be useful. But the fact is - your patch changes 4 places... ok, I'll rename. > > > See devlink as an example > > I don't know what part of devlink you mean at a quick scroll. I overlooked "return err" in the middle. You are right. Thanks