From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1649666475; x= 1649752875; bh=Zpd0dbMP4Qqg9X4hnW+fvYt79OSKTVRKGbShdxRmpz8=; b=W EXBJUdrtt46g9rFPLJc2LK70WpYvV2dQ4uaEyx88GQ1MfNWOM1maljBdMlwyjpiN l2MER2ZQ+PcDhKd2W6pFcFPqW+65l5Gud7haY7TIhkoHHYFnSkTwhBPzV1LxQAcV ZIwrBD7w6qFW6PZ3VhEQXfUNDT9KVJbtLmqSb7OrV+o9mdm8n6YaZWDG21y4MXK/ cQePpTYVyUjHDucETekE7dm9NKWQXcgvNTo74uTe8XbENk8MLOEWAE88u4A1FzQk YGRlOBN0YSj9SJbVd4MNU9+crMvpzfi1PcUQQGWTY/dhrtIAAP6PM0FOpUQ3j+Tj MOat/POqg+BCEWPbF8t7g== Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:41:12 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel Message-ID: References: <20220409105857.803667-1-razor@blackwall.org> <20220409105857.803667-4-razor@blackwall.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220409105857.803667-4-razor@blackwall.org> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: bridge: fdb: add new nl attribute-based flush call List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nikolay Aleksandrov Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, roopa@nvidia.com On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 01:58:54PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h > index 221a4256808f..2f3799cf14b2 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h > @@ -807,7 +807,15 @@ enum { > /* embedded in IFLA_BRIDGE_FLUSH */ > enum { > BRIDGE_FLUSH_UNSPEC, > + BRIDGE_FLUSH_FDB, > __BRIDGE_FLUSH_MAX > }; > #define BRIDGE_FLUSH_MAX (__BRIDGE_FLUSH_MAX - 1) > + > +/* embedded in BRIDGE_FLUSH_FDB */ > +enum { > + FDB_FLUSH_UNSPEC, BTW, is there a reason this is not called FLUSH_FDB_UNSPEC given it's embedded in BRIDGE_FLUSH_FDB, which is embedded in IFLA_BRIDGE_FLUSH ? Regardless, in the cover letter you have '[ BRIDGE_FDB_FLUSH ]', which is actually BRIDGE_FLUSH_FDB. I only noticed it because the code didn't match what I had in my notebook, which I copied from the cover letter :) > + __FDB_FLUSH_MAX > +}; > +#define FDB_FLUSH_MAX (__FDB_FLUSH_MAX - 1) > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_IF_BRIDGE_H */