From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E03F8819F5 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org D7B0D819ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1664784534; x=1664870934; bh=aqoxBah/X4GiH9ZDPQqIa9iZT5FE /SnWRIkJ33v/MSg=; b=mH/yyc34ZlANnESS3QyuEXuqm3u4UBZ9kLJh2miT5S8x Bic1WTsWQFD4GURfAVcHFRCGEYmVOFe58keAeWKTjoCA0AAzBoWyG0HWDmkDXCPs cn+kdoaaWeflSeiDlX/F3yYwO2aWv0aGXw0JSlECZ/PRWLyHU7F7thAKNE4xXygr RYQtuZbbxOwxvlL4EKpzjMrxdVOnHjz0EcRH5eac/FW+oNcbDOLCKObCw84n6a+C HqtWNyJ47FGZJNTx6Ub0IvUER1VgQ10sphr/GXUeJZ9OmPsv2sks9i2Wq+ddjWQ5 wXRDVJDVs0iAf/A5xh4d4lRp7k+/qta3R9Mh7z/IHQ== Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:08:48 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel Message-ID: References: <20220929152137.167626-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <29ab01c9b8e51a57fb83e4af6fa1193f@kapio-technology.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29ab01c9b8e51a57fb83e4af6fa1193f@kapio-technology.com> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH iproute2-next 1/2] bridge: link: enable MacAuth/MAB feature List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: netdev@kapio-technology.com Cc: Andrew Lunn , Alexandre Belloni , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Kurt Kanzenbach , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Joachim Wiberg , Shuah Khan , Ivan Vecera , Florian Fainelli , Daniel Borkmann , Florent Fourcot , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ido Schimmel , kuba@kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh , Landen Chao , Jiri Pirko , Amit Cohen , Christian Marangi , Hauke Mehrtens , Hans Schultz , Sean Wang , DENG Qingfang , Claudiu Manoil , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Yuwei Wang , Petr Machata , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vladimir Oltean , davem@davemloft.net On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote: > On 2022-10-01 16:59, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > > IIRC, in the past David asked to either not send the uAPI files or send > > them as a first patch which he then uses as a hint to sync the files > > himself. > > > > Does that imply that I make a patch in the beginning for the include/uapi > changes wrt the Locked flag and another in the same manner for the > Blackhole, or just one patch for both of them as the very first patch? One patch for both as the very first patch. Example: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1615985531.git.petrm@nvidia.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ad9b63d5c76d9ef045dfed6dc9b5ab946e62e450.1615985531.git.petrm@nvidia.com/ The patch is obviously not needed if the uAPI files were already updated by David.