From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 2155B40608 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org BD85A4049A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=pfvsBaIqWwoqOvoXo00aYLq0SVQd4NSeURZBvjDErCc=; b=gGKDHrt49O5Jxk0akclaptH306cBEtbWKExwC7ju5XEn8cF6zVojgXRV7Dck0SR6RyNtuXqAHvJKehDSaSNaanBImpZw8teAfrhVj5ORD0Pjl2cMBJlMfMp/hocU5i+o5LP41GucGZzsmKJ2tHCXKIDXOiBL3ealksMtjLHD61dMZumccDSeNowSRbjqnEMfU7CeHLCb1YYacSHwPLyYGGrLo+GOnra/IpBtHLI09o+bTsXPowQ2K0qCNSt+A/8vjm9apWZKRiFxlxe4RrOLCm6Qs4V8Y+i0SKanc+wEVndEXwmVfoaYTazwds5qE1stKhhFyb8IZRs1rhC1BBcm4A== Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:04:11 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel Message-ID: References: <20230413095830.2182382-1-idosch@nvidia.com> <95a773f6-5f88-712e-c494-9414d7090144@blackwall.org> <20230419145124.5z47v2p62nbskqr2@skbuf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230419145124.5z47v2p62nbskqr2@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bridge] [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] bridge: Add per-{Port, VLAN} neighbor suppression List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: petrm@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@google.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com, roopa@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > > > For the set: > > > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov > > > > Thanks! Will rebase, retest and submit v1 > > Shouldn't the version numbers be independent of the RFC/PATCH > designation (and thus this would be a v2)? I know I was extremely > confused when I had to review a series by Colin Foster which jumped back > and forth between PATCH v6, RFC v3, PATCH v7, etc. Makes sense. Will mark it v2