From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com (mail-lf1-f47.google.com [209.85.167.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5229D16D320 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.47 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718644801; cv=none; b=jcz8BbDZNWXgK1LIvsRM6l4EA2R05ITjGEZoyO2kR1lvzxXVqqjUhz8V0c4bidIjq3r7DcuoOSHwLZIynq/UUqFo9ujmtBfRw2279Q6eifvokejmharYQyj6oxx2g+jHuK/FW0jix/YtzSPLVFe6Gzk445FWeqCEqqGdrAgEoHg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718644801; c=relaxed/simple; bh=viLDpuJKEVzbprFQO23qfBQGXZv55FGbFpR7JPV8Aik=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t2ERHr8FQPwMczO/gM2XLiFlFfYps2iT+b/WA5H0okILTJy+2uQYiCnUI2govMbs4p6X1Rep+IQAXEQ8RcWGkA3/a+ycDser2a7CN3gEkiZg0ecVWaDuSxm16uucougeCbgqyLb3PECYVxNNSfDqkUXfjaAr3ERvbMK+e6z2PTw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=fnH2w05u; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fnH2w05u" Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52cc1528c83so470751e87.2 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:19:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718644797; x=1719249597; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vZ8O3vkKnV5WMsPPzukATAgUwpYfoN3xcCe/8i65jUE=; b=fnH2w05uKwZ4+4Bhaq1raQ2cSGE+4XUIj92PPmnvFXl0l0PG4wVY79WeCEQSwadPCm qQ8bOuzl0kpaAIrqc08IK9XvvInCvGUoRDay2Jv8a4wqFvR62aFNFFgkGf7JjFtlbv3f 68LDv7JFRIPFK7rquKrhJBI6GdImFQbMEQozwZbStzcphRTNVETsnbNkcG9ugUTu4jSk +IsBcS89Ck8dp8qTvNSVWizgZJuU9AdKJZFTvrQKyoKOJh17vK6SUzsLriUNGsg7f43E BhrECh/yEVNCgn6nGZC0AFo5fX02y8Z5leUv4xw8c+S4oRNo8+TWO6beIg/Vpr+ScplJ IrGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718644797; x=1719249597; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vZ8O3vkKnV5WMsPPzukATAgUwpYfoN3xcCe/8i65jUE=; b=vnIj3gLQjjtytUO5+NcmWu3e2ohBe9uBNkzk/gpjtav2XduLxyqqUiw6vCRjmfOBul 2Dp+gWg/H30O/mP+Lv6ET2jl82n5XklKI36jLJ5t10pgYFDU5wkQEPCys+Iooc/+LaxB WiviLJfaiQV13C/ZP9mwfwMmr+UHbX7MVam0vShdraCGiKLYlElO39sYr1EVBcOJ1URj VDV4YTsVWN2W7N4bIx3YOfiO9T0IXVHVK3TUthss0GXVG1ewHoZH8pJY0ORUGclYjLQP RzNLyebwUUT1TOZJhkA4xOryNKDK0qk4uaHHtMWE6mUZdgZ2NZn7DtViBHpMIxVDssiu LT9Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUBax7cHBY3D2VOor2BgZ6ltUWuM3Nk8Z1mDX98SxFyfYdAlKIq/0zF5GiMih+ykyFWFSQJfUeTJCDgY6FcaILYXw4x3+aq X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxrQeI8K9EpNriDmaemLN/kBvN9hE2yvpOPHxTfBTDTY8vWBRte 2VtTjCm/RvqOQypCg4Z0MiGASriUwGDcx3VZZ7uhxzemrC5vm4IA X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF+kn6orlxXNu+KbBfK5TuJ9FRTaW/E7mKFLwWnfY9/g3N+9lA943ajPi6EK1Z9MmgGKAp4XQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c5a:0:b0:52c:88d6:891d with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52ca6e5637emr6427245e87.9.1718644797253; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (host-90-233-216-238.mobileonline.telia.com. [90.233.216.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-52ca28722b0sm1286680e87.126.2024.06.17.10.19.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:19:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:19:53 +0200 To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , "Paul E. McKenney" , Vlastimil Babka , Jakub Kicinski , Julia Lawall , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Naveen N. Rao" , Christophe Leroy , Nicholas Piggin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bridge@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:57:45PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:42:23PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:33:23PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 6:30 PM Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > Here if an "err" is less then "0" means there are still objects > > > > whereas "is_destroyed" is set to "true" which is not correlated > > > > with a comment: > > > > > > > > "Destruction happens when no objects" > > > > > > The comment is just poorly written. But the logic of the code is right. > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > > > > > out_unlock: > > > > > mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex); > > > > > cpus_read_unlock(); > > > > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > > > > > index 1373ac365a46..7db8fe90a323 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/slub.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/slub.c > > > > > @@ -4510,6 +4510,8 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x) > > > > > return; > > > > > trace_kmem_cache_free(_RET_IP_, x, s); > > > > > slab_free(s, virt_to_slab(x), x, _RET_IP_); > > > > > + if (s->is_destroyed) > > > > > + kmem_cache_destroy(s); > > > > > Here i am not follow you. How do you see that a cache has been fully > > freed? Or is it just super draft code? > > kmem_cache_destroy() does this in shutdown_cache(). > Right. In this scenario you invoke kmem_cache_destroy() over and over until the last object gets freed. This potentially slowing the kmem_cache_free() which is not OK, at least to me. -- Uladzislau Rezki