From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 3910C40C5C DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 284E840C10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:33:58 +0200 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com In-Reply-To: References: <20220708115624.rrjzjtidlhcqczjv@skbuf> <723e2995314b41ff323272536ef27341@kapio-technology.com> <79683d9cf122e22b66b5da3bbbb0ee1f@kapio-technology.com> <6c6fe135ce7b5b118289dc370135b0d3@kapio-technology.com> <2491232d5c017d94ca3213197a3fb283@kapio-technology.com> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ido Schimmel Cc: Ivan Vecera , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Jiri Pirko , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu , kuba@kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean , Shuah Khan , davem@davemloft.net On 2022-08-11 13:28, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> > >> > I'm talking about roaming, not forwarding. Let's say you have a locked >> > entry with MAC X pointing to port Y. Now you get a packet with SMAC X >> > from port Z which is unlocked. Will the FDB entry roam to port Z? I >> > think it should, but at least in current implementation it seems that >> > the "locked" flag will not be reset and having locked entries pointing >> > to an unlocked port looks like a bug. >> > Yes, now I have tried to test with a case like this using the bridge and have verified the locked entry pointing to an unlocked port, which I agree seems to be a bug, which I will get fixed.