From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794272911; b=rmHBtSsH8eRPYK+uBExDxb+lETMJGQtAyqXS4PNbtktYdYxDTRKH2KWMCcURKTqM2+WK Piud73hirTJ31Nk9upFQNOQMhCv4Rg80pnCnqvHKWpeEQSvHZB9ASh2V9eViGFViuHjqs ALoAkEaDTbIblN4DCMELarWOg/alPqb0NlFt51k/0JmV+mB/V+FwBJpa8nzDp5PHeG3tm 7+r2bCgcuBhuZMfHJ8gmKJlOnL43JeaSMpYca9XdKEX3rfhLA+Yq2qOwkl694acBVqXMM PRpzQ+oAt83z0cOAxYaCmMIa8TuvAht4eGq79Bj9zomhMnONZPy0fFdJm8J7dQTbmvQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794272911; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version; bh=x36i1u1Ug+CsRO14sJNtHgtErxuuo8Mk9cH4G1xa/s4=; b=ssEweJKp1ve9NiGMvB0rPMAAcmRv/Z7UQf2Ev6aY9rrA6u9kJJd5n0euMWalAZbcVC5P LFlyyqV6WXjf7DSjxrAEK5OCirqglV5hBtqc2og5S0DJE6BhjIC90TP5NxJpFVAe6uhaL rlrVcOeX7VhJYOpQtBtsP97TIYt3PmjlfWL+2/4rGzSd2c8KAfxmOkKhQwzs4hJJo3kG5 TkQr6N0zCitQOu8svpZrp7KbIGL0AYIWJelg6GDlBcuB87m5fknjC9wKYc3H0LFQtgKef IKLw5GELQ1cFTg5Tpt/U3opbi6NLNnSKWUpCx0S+RkkWzC7iotXz0UeJCVFvIWVg54w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=MdsVN4E4; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id B3DB1606A31C for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 01:08:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org B3DB1606A31C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=MdsVN4E4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1794272909; bh=x36i1u1Ug+CsRO14sJNtHgtErxuuo8Mk9cH4G1xa/s4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MdsVN4E4iogadZhZ7ORSwt0JptmXZKE9Us7gR3oCWvLOqMMkL+9bl6sQEoYNBy38p qPE6DOfvXgo+w6Y8hupDpGG8gSet1Lw17pKNtG/V8awdSWb5YBloR0Mk1I8i7qQelq Dfb0HLiH88Fcvr8ZxvyaaV730A+RBly4n09VMRHxc1g82EStp0LrLx02IY4zZAL/wT QG8tyqcwgqdoBhxUMCNyYqBgDTQR35vfv6vGiQh7VsJOsh8hVa4NBIwQ12CqCdh0GJ ftuEAnqjcPyEjhk4496fHKAdGiKaevYwdy56CVDU8WC70XFJ7bz6Poq10UnWeO8hz+ /vpxzE/zToGxg== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id F28146005B; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 02:08:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 02:08:26 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Laveesh Bansal Cc: Florian Westphal , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Ido Schimmel , syzbot+a8ba738fe2db6b4bb27f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/2] netfilter: bridge: refragment packets with a vlan tag moved by the bridge Message-ID: References: <20261110010450.68995-1-laveeshb@laveeshbansal.com> X-Mailing-List: bridge@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261110010450.68995-1-laveeshb@laveeshbansal.com> On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 05:04:50PM -0800, Laveesh Bansal wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 01:44:10AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > Do you have a usecase for this? > > I found this through the syzbot report and haven't seen a user report of > it. Yes, there is a patch to fix replace the WARN_ON_ONCE() that could be found. But does it make sense what syzbot is trying in real life? > This is the follow-up for nf-next we discussed in > https://lore.kernel.org/r/atck-NoWvemxIsF6@chamomile. Yes, I remember, thanks for the link.