From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Foos Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Buildroot] BASE_TARGETS aren't build References: <20070725200039.GA26294@firebird.dresden.micronet24.de> Message-ID: <001401c7cf55$7f2bb890$6404a8c0@shukson> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net GDB in particular is now broken on a clean build, and stops the build. This recently happened. I agree many others have been trying to build w/o a toolchain for some time. Rick Foos ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Tietz" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:00 PM Subject: [Buildroot] BASE_TARGETS aren't build > Hi, > > some days ago the building of the toolchain and the crosscompiler was > moved from TARGETS to BASE_TARGETS, and the second made dependent of the > first. It looked nice, but at least for me, it doesn't work. > > Getting a virgin buildroot building all the packages (and the toolchain) > doesn't take this dependency in account and starts to compile packages > for the target. Without an working gcc this may be difficult... > > There were a rule, some time ago - never break the build - where is it > gone. Some time ago the buildroot built, even for avr32, without to much > problems. There going discussions on about distributional packages and > BSPs. > But as long as the toolchain doesn't built, all these gimmicks aren't > usable. > > By the way that problem isn't the only thing broken at the moment; I > fixed it by now by reverting the patch and letting the toolchain compile > as usual targets. > > regards > > Benjamin > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at uclibc.org > http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > >