From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] updating package/mtd
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:42:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00c401c88a95$dff82180$e0c4af0a@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080320102730.GA1454@cloud.net.au
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hamish Moffatt" <hamish@cloud.net.au>
To: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
Cc: <buildroot@uclibc.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] updating package/mtd
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:57:13AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> >> > I'm going to update package/mtd to support a newer version, because I
>> >> > need access to ubi and other new tools.
>> >> >
>> >> > Using the MTD snapshot version seems to be broken - there are no
>> >> > snapshots on the ftp.uk.linux.org server any more. Also I think we could
>> >> > merge the makefiles for the 2005* and 2006* versions.
>> >> >
>> >> > Any comments, thoughts, objections, requests?
>> >>
>> >> If you want to work on this, you need to test the result on AT45 dataflash.
>> >> Unless you have access to such a target, I suggest you leave the 2006 support there
>> >> and add yet another version.
>> >
>> > OK. Is AT45 dataflash not working in the current git version, or 1.1.0?
>> > Do we need the 2005* version as well, and also the 1.1.0 release which
>> > is the latest of the 3 current working options?
>> >
>>
>> Have no clue if it is working in the git.
>> I know 2005 isn't, but I could not test on a multitude of targets,
>> therefore I added 2006 (which works for AT45) but allowed
>> people to keep 2005.
>> IIRC, There are different directory structures between 2005 and 2006,
>> making it hard to share makefiles.
>>
>> > I need something from git myself to get access to the ubi tools.
>> >
>>
>> Suggest you use a separate makefile for the latest version to avoid trouble.
>> AT91 should use 2006 by default.
>
> OK. I was going to remove the snapshot from the 2005* makefile and
> create a separate one. That will make it all slightly tidier and
> symmetric at least.
>
That makes sense to me.
No need for snapshot support in 2005 or 2006.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-20 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-18 6:35 [Buildroot] updating package/mtd Hamish Moffatt
2008-03-19 21:45 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-19 23:49 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-03-20 8:57 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-03-20 10:27 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-03-20 13:42 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00c401c88a95$dff82180$e0c4af0a@atmel.com' \
--to=ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox