Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot-20070720
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:19:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00e901c7e4b6$d77a8460$070514ac@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070822080818.GA7523@aon.at

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bernhard Fischer" <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@atmel.com>
Cc: "Buildroot" <buildroot@uclibc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] buildroot-20070720


> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:47:57AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>ons 2007-08-22 klockan 01:08 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer:
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:08:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>> >Since the buildroot ftp site only maintains one month old tarball,
>>> >this package has already disappeared.
>>> >It would be good if that tarball could be downloadable as well
>>> >so that the diff can be computed.
>>> 
>>> To me this doesn't make any sense at all.
>>> svn co -r'{2007-07-20 00:00}' svn://uclibc.org/trunk/buildroot buildroot
>>> 
>>> What do you want to achieve with a tarball? Doesn't svn diff work just
>>> fine? And, what's special about that 20070720 snapshot in the first
>>> place?
>>
>>Sorry, wrong mailing list.
>>Was intended for an Atmel internal mailing list.
>>The "Evolution" Mail program does not easily show how
>>it completes a mail address.
>>
>>http://www.atmel.no/buildroot/ is based on 20070718.
>>Would like to move this stuff to the main trunk
>>
>>I got an earlier version in the summertime, and did not have
>>the original source so I diffed against the current,
>>and tried to figure out what was added.
>>That was the time, when I reverted some of your patches.
>>
>>Would like to avoid that, so I want the original source.
> 
> Perhaps it would be a good idea if you (atmel) would use an SCM instead
> of tarballs. Would make your life way easier, i imagine. Just a
> thought..
>

They are using "git" and remove all svn info before they enter into their git system.
They do not want to work with svn.

Is there any chance that buildroot is moving over to "git"?.

Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson                ulf at atmel.com
Atmel Nordic AB
Mail:  Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Visit:  Kavalleriv?gen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Phone +46 (8) 441 54 22     Fax +46 (8) 441 54 29
GSM    +46 (706) 22 44 57

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-22 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-21 21:08 [Buildroot] buildroot-20070720 Ulf Samuelsson
2007-08-21 23:08 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-08-22  3:47   ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-08-22  8:08     ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-08-22 12:19       ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2007-08-22 12:40         ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-08-22 16:43           ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-08-22 19:19             ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-08-22 19:22             ` Benjamin Tietz
2007-08-22  4:35   ` Ulf Samuelsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00e901c7e4b6$d77a8460$070514ac@atmel.com' \
    --to=ulf@atmel.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox