From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patchfailes
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:20:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <015801c7d404$0f9291d0$dcc4af0a@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0707312209460.11633@somehost
>> Conflicts between linux-2.6.21.5-002-lzma-vmlinuz.01.patch and
>> linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch?
>
> Questions:
>
> Is it really necessary to apply these patches? Even though .config shows?
>
> # BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_TARGET is not set
> # BR2_PACKAGE_LZMA_HOST is not set
> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_LZMA is not set
> # BR2_avr32 is not set
> # BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ATMEL_AVR32 is not set
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea for each successfully applied patch to have a
> target and a prequisite?
>
> <patch name>: <patch name>.done
>
> so that, if a patch fails and is fixed on the spot, remake skipps the
> already applied patches?
>
We are currently discussing the mess with separate patch strategies
for the kernel headers and the linux build.
I proposed that both the kernel-headers and the linux should use the same patch directories.
This is only the case, if the kernel-headers and the linux version are the same today.
A long term approach could be to keep the kernel-headers for pre 2.6.19 kernels only
and build the headers in the target/linux directory, with patches
divided into groups of patches which are or are not applied depending on
menu configurations.
Typically you would have
"core" patches - always applied
"architecture" patches - always applied if an architecture is selected
"board" patches - conditionally applied through a choice.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-01 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 19:51 [Buildroot] linux-2.6.21.5-003-atmel.1-avr32-updates.patch failes Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
2007-07-31 19:56 ` Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
2007-07-31 20:19 ` Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
2007-08-01 6:20 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2007-08-01 10:36 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-08-01 11:50 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-07-31 22:52 ` Ulf Samuelsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='015801c7d404$0f9291d0$dcc4af0a@atmel.com' \
--to=ulf@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox