From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulfs@dof.se>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:35:48 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Add local directory for non-public packages
References: <1169593120.5361.17.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com>
	<20070124001104.GB17761@codepoet.org>
	<8558857.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<1169650922.21018.4.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com>
	<20070124202942.GA21800@tuxedo.home.lan>
Message-ID: <028401c74002$a4c318b0$01c4af0a@atmel.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Lars Munch wrote:
> Hi Ulf
> 
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch which includes the local/Config.in.
>> As I explained in the previous Email, the "package/customize"
>> and "local" have two distinct functions.
>> If you move up "buildroot/package/customize" to "buildroot/customize"
>> and make the "Config.in" and "customize.mk" empty,
>> then that would be ok as well.
> [snip]
> 
> I really like this idea of having a directory for "local" packages,
> but I think it would be nice to take it a step further and make it
> possible to set the directory where the "local" packages are located.
> Then it will be possible to have your "local" packages out of the
> buildroot tree. 
> 

Not a bad idea!


> Just my 2 cent.
> 
> -- Lars Munch

Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson