From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [Buildroot] _VER vs. _VERSION breakage
In-Reply-To: <20070723095243.GC6597@aon.at>
References: <20070715104024.GB4096@aon.at>
	<1184615647.18357.27.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com>
	<20070723095243.GC6597@aon.at>
Message-ID: <0707231218440.1707@somehost>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:54:06PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> >s?n 2007-07-15 klockan 12:40 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer:
> >> Ulf,
> >>
> >> Your change to use _VERSION broke at least acpid. Please double-check
> >> that all packages that you touched in this patch still build fine and
> >> repair.
> >
> >Here is the result of trying to build most available packages
> >in buildroot for ARM. (I build for ARM generic (not using WCHAR)).
>
> I will revert that _VERSION vs. _VER patch since it breaks a couple of
> packages.

Now this is IMO a rather silly :( You made your point.  Can't you just
fix those "couple of packages" instead and stop this ping-pong game?


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian