From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Lindahl <marc@bowery.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:15:03 -0500
Subject: [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds
In-Reply-To: <8849503.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <8849503.post@talk.nabble.com>
Message-ID: <077c2d7a1ff28ebd8d9aa6ddbc124dd3@bowery.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

+1

On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Daniel Laird wrote:

>
> I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system.  Do 
> people
> think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a 
> log of
> package configures.
> would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good 
> idea?
> This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to 
> configure
> else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems
> What do people think?
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Enabling-Static-builds-tf3188244.html#a8849503
> Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot