From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:18:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Still no answer for a contribution made in March References: <20080611161156.33737116@crazy><46a136670806110808x737929a4red33f32c593ae6e2@mail.gmail.com><20080611154121.GI3795@mx.loc> <20080612095933.25f3345e@crazy> <871w33doy1.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <0c2401c8cc99$baad47c0$0c0514ac@atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net > Hi, > > >> Yea, and that's the reason why the svn-repo is completely fux0red up. > > Thomas> I don't necessarly think so. Here, the issue is not a bottleneck at the > Thomas> commit level, but rather a patch review bandwidth problem. > > Agree - And lack of testing before stuff gets checked in. The deeper > issue is that we don't do releases I guess, so there's a tension > between doing development, and having something stable for actual use. > Maybe we should start? Other project are using "git" and is sneering at "svn". Should we change? > I have gotten a login to the gcc cluster, and have plans to setup a > buildbot instance to do regression tests on buildroot. > > Thomas> What's the relationship between your Git repo and the > Thomas> official Subversion tree ? When is your tree pulled into the > Thomas> official Subversion tree ? Who review the patches and when ? > > Bernard's git tree is a fork of the svn repo from some time > ago. There's no official sync, but he sometimes cherrypicks commits > from svn, and I sometimes do the same from his tree. > > It's a pity, but has historical reasons. > > -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson