From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos Santos Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:40:16 -0300 (BRT) Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional In-Reply-To: <20160531210122.39a50d97@free-electrons.com> References: <1462535953-4427-1-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br> <1462736800-9552-1-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br> <1462736800-9552-2-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br> <20160528150755.78888529@free-electrons.com> <468666808.273843.1464715989675.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br> <20160531210122.39a50d97@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <1106718859.329816.1464723616437.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net > From: "Thomas Petazzoni" > To: "Carlos Santos" > Cc: buildroot at buildroot.org, "yann morin 1998" > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 4:01:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional > Hello, > > On Tue, 31 May 2016 14:33:09 -0300 (BRT), Carlos Santos wrote: > >> > 3/ Improving FIT support for the host variant >> > >> > 4/ Improving FIT support for the target variant >> >> Tasks 3 and 4 can not be separated because both depend on the new patch that >> makes FIT support really optional. > > Of course they can be separated. Just include the patch that makes FIT > support really optional into patch (3) from my list. Step 3 would make the ...MKIMAGE_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option useless. Once the patch is applied, FIT support depends on passing CONFIG_FIT=y in the make command line, which would be made done only in step 4. >> OK, I will make these changes. I'd like to emphasize, however, that >> currently uboot-tools is broken. FIT support is always compiled, so >> run-time dependence on "dtc" persists but dtc is not selected in >> Config.in{.host,}. This is the problem that my initial patch intended >> to fix. > > Sure, that's why I reviewed your patch, and suggested a few > improvements that should be made to allow us to apply the patch. Once > the improvements are made, I believe we should be able to apply it > pretty quickly. Carlos Santos (Casantos) DATACOM, P&D