From: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v6 1/2] e2fsprogs: refactor to fix conflicts with busybox and util-linux
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:09:11 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11759472.18619266.1491952151697.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d478a120-5823-895e-c211-fe7e5a4f3017@mind.be>
> From: "Arnout Vandecappelle" <arnout@mind.be>
> To: "Carlos Santos" <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
> Cc: buildroot at buildroot.org, "Maxime Hadjinlian" <maxime.hadjinlian@gmail.com>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>, "Yann E . MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 7:14:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] e2fsprogs: refactor to fix conflicts with busybox and util-linux
> On 11-04-17 18:59, Carlos Santos wrote:
---8<---
>> I made a deep overhauling because the original recipe was so messy that
>> small changes did not work. It is now reasonable to artificially split the
>> change in seven patches now to end up with exactly the same result. It's
>> harder to implement, test and review, considering all possible options I
>> need to deal with:
>
> I agree that it's a little bit harder to implement, but not to test and review.
> And it's pretty likely that you will not get the same result, because proper
> review will be done, problems will be discovered, and you end up with a
> different result :-)
>
> If you don't split this up, don't expect the patch to be applied for the next
> year or so. The review burden is simply too high.
I see. That's really sad.
--
Carlos Santos (Casantos) - DATACOM, P&D
?The greatest triumph that modern PR can offer is the transcendent
success of having your words and actions judged by your reputation,
rather than the other way about.? ? Christopher Hitchens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 3:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 2/2] systemd: select fsck wrapper from util-linux Carlos Santos
2017-04-10 9:19 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-10 11:49 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6 1/2] e2fsprogs: refactor to fix conflicts with busybox and util-linux Carlos Santos
2017-04-10 11:49 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6 2/2] systemd: select fsck wrapper from util-linux Carlos Santos
2017-04-10 22:05 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-10 12:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6 1/2] e2fsprogs: refactor to fix conflicts with busybox and util-linux Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-11 16:59 ` Carlos Santos
2017-04-11 22:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-11 23:09 ` Carlos Santos [this message]
2017-04-12 7:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11759472.18619266.1491952151697.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br \
--to=casantos@datacom.ind.br \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox