From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:48:35 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] staging_dir/usr/lib vs staging_dir/lib In-Reply-To: <1185947996.20419.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <07c301c7d3a1$ebb2fdc0$2600a8c0@engineering5> <1185947996.20419.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1185954515.32541.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 07:59 +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 13:38 -0500, Christopher Reder wrote: > > It seems like there may be some confusion over what directories to use > > when installing/hosting/storing libs. > > Probably my bad (-: I cleaned up libpng, libungif and fbv. Although my upstream snapshot is some days old. > > I just pulled down the latest and enabled fbv which selected libungif. > > In doing so, it fails when it tries to remove libs from > > staging_dir/lib because the libs are actually in > > staging_dir/usr/lib. > > Weird, because staging_dir/usr is a symlink to staging_dir/. Actually, removing libungif.la is not something that should have been done when installing (I think, anybody know the reason?). I have replaced it with a SED fixing the libdir in the included patch. -- With kind regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: br2-clean-libpng-libungif-and-fbv.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 3855 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20070801/5be1e4ce/attachment.bin