From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Kukard Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:38:47 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] avr32 patches vs. x86 breakage In-Reply-To: <873aqk32yb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <1206079232.2562.60.camel@nigel-x60> <87k5jw34gp.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1206086506.2562.64.camel@nigel-x60> <873aqk32yb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <1206088727.2562.72.camel@nigel-x60> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi, > >> - package-version-*.patch for generic stuff > >> - arch-package-version-*.patch for arch specific stuff > >> > >> What do you think? > > Nigel> What about patch order? and patch order when there is generic stuff and > Nigel> arch specific? > > My (possibly too simplistic) view on things is to first apply the > generic patches, and then the arch specific ones. yea, generic first I think aswell. few more thoughts... these would be in for instance toolchain/gcc/ 1. version/*.patch - generic version/arch/*.patch - arch specific 2. version/*.patch arch-version/*.patch 3. version-*.patch arch-version-*.patch -N -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20080321/9ad75c06/attachment.pgp