From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: JS <js@hipro.co.in>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:08:28 +0530
Subject: [Buildroot] reply-to munging (was) [Fwd: Re: svn
	commit:	trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc/4.2.1:
	avr32_patches_break_x86]
In-Reply-To: <1206120659.2562.111.camel@nigel-x60>
References: <1206120659.2562.111.camel@nigel-x60>
Message-ID: <1206124708.4692.6.camel@localhost>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net


On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 17:30 +0000, Nigel Kukard wrote:
> Argh ... would it be ok to set the default ML reply-to as the ML? or an
> insane proposition from my side? ;)

Is 'reply-to munging' against list policy?

-- 
HiPro Solutions
http://hipro.co.in/