From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:15:45 -0700 Subject: [Buildroot] lockfiles got it In-Reply-To: <1209402063.3050.13.camel@rhodan.rho> References: <48109359.5010204@logicway.de> <1209401096.3050.6.camel@rhodan.rho> <1209402063.3050.13.camel@rhodan.rho> Message-ID: <1209402945.26710.3.camel@rhodan.rho> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net It looks like buildroot doesn't like the 1.11-0.1 as there are compilation errors (I renamed the build_arm directory to match the package and mk names). I googled and found an ubuntu source tarball for 1.11 that worked flawlessly (just hope the ubuntu sources works as a binary too). Except I now see why sid was used - the tarball has everything in a directory named sid instead of the package name. On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 10:01 -0700, p wrote: > Oop. the directory does not in fact exist. lockfile-progs-0.1.11 is > created even though the version was set to 0.1.11-0.1 > > I should also mention that > > LOCKFILE_PROGS_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/sid > > somehow made it in. > > > > > > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 09:44 -0700, p wrote: > > In reality .unpacked is missing for some reason. > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at uclibc.org > http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot