From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Makefile.autotools.in does not work wellwith projects
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217234124.7955.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080727013317.GA1706@cloud.net.au>
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 11:33 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 08:53:43AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Makefile.autotools.in does not work wellwith
> > projects
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:43:09PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> >>> The Makefile.autotools.in uses a rule which touches a
> >>> stamp_target_installed file, this does not work well with projects.
> >>>
> >>> The Makefile should depend on a file on the target root file system,
> >>> file not there => install to target again.
> >>
> >> Indeed - install stamps are pure evil. They don't work with multiple
> >> projects and they mean you can't "rm -rf
> >> project_build_$(ARCH)/$(PROJECT)/root".
> >
> > I do not think that you want to have install stamps in the root file system
> > because they will end up in the target (unless they are ignored when
> > the rootfs is created).
>
> I don't think you should use stamps at all - test for a target file
> instead.
>
Yes, something in the order of a must defined variable pointing to
$(TARGET_DIR)/$(FOO_TARGET_INSTALLED_FILE) ?
I tried jugling the Makefile magic, but I was not able to generate a
nice dotfile in the $(PROJECT_BUILD_DIR). See the patch below, 0.02 ? to
anybody who can spot what I do wrong.
--
With kind regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt, Applications Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: makefile-autotools-in.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1889 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20080728/9659faa4/attachment.bin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-24 14:43 [Buildroot] Makefile.autotools.in does not work well with projects Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-07-25 0:12 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-07-26 6:53 ` [Buildroot] Makefile.autotools.in does not work wellwith projects Ulf Samuelsson
2008-07-27 1:33 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-07-28 8:35 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt [this message]
2008-07-28 8:42 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-07-28 8:50 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-07-28 8:52 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-07-30 10:19 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-08-06 6:31 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-08-06 8:54 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-08-06 9:04 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217234124.7955.6.camel@localhost \
--to=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox