From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:16:01 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot In-Reply-To: <1231179121.8886.225.camel@linux-yrgm.site> References: <20090105161237.034D977404@busybox.osuosl.org> <1231179121.8886.225.camel@linux-yrgm.site> Message-ID: <1231179361.8886.228.camel@linux-yrgm.site> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net m?n 2009-01-05 klockan 19:12 +0100 skrev Ulf Samuelsson: > m?n 2009-01-05 klockan 16:12 +0000 skrev jacmet at uclibc.org: > > Author: jacmet > > Date: 2009-01-05 16:12:34 +0000 (Mon, 05 Jan 2009) > > New Revision: 24693 > > > > Log: > > u-boot: revert U_BOOT_TARGET part of r24646 > > > > More u-boot build unbreaking. r24646 added U_BOOT_TARGET which uses the > > nonexisting BOARDNAME variable, which means that the filename expands > > to -u-boot-*, confusing ln. > > > > There's limited point in having that symlink in the first please, so simply > > revert that hunk. > > > > If you have a script that needs the filename u-boot.bin > then it make sense. > > > Modified: > > trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/Makefile.in > > > > > > The "complex" file name is needed, unless you only > work with a single board. > > We obviously need to find a way that does not break the build of > course. > > Many targets define BR2_BOARD_NAME in their Config.in's > and it may make sense to have a common BR2_BOARD_NAME > Then it will be always be defined. > Default to "uclibc" is probably OK. > > Even better is to define it as ?U_BOOT_TARGET:=$(PROJECT)-u-boot-$(U_BOOT_VERSION)-$(DATE).bin That is always defined, so that should not break the build. BR /Ulf