From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:16:47 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc1 In-Reply-To: <87mye4qz4d.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <20090103000614.1DC5F769FA@busybox.osuosl.org> <87mye4qz4d.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <1231255007.32308.107.camel@elrond.atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net tis 2009-01-06 klockan 15:37 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard: > >>>>> "ulf" == ulf writes: > > ulf> Author: ulf > ulf> Date: 2009-01-03 00:06:13 +0000 (Sat, 03 Jan 2009) > ulf> New Revision: 24658 > I discovered I made a mistake and checked in the 1.3.4 patch so it will be updated later today The original is part of the atmel 1.3.4 patch freom www.linux4sam.org ?There will be some other fixes due to the CFG->CONFIG(_SYS) I have tested the new patches to build for all possible AT91 targets in buildroot as well as for a PowerPC target. Generally on patches to u-boot: The AT91 team got zero response from the U-Boot during 2003-2005 so they dropped all attempts to submit new stuff. After it was decided to split the responsibilities up to several people, the submission process has improved a lot, so the AT91 team started to be interested again last year. The board support for AT91 processors has improved. The AT91RM9200 has less priority on support from the product line and has therefore not been submitted, even if patches has been available for a long time. Currently the merge window is closed, but I expect to submit the board support patches and some of the new commands end of January. The factory default command relies heavily on the buildroot configuration, so it may make less sense to include that in the main u-boot trunk. > ulf> Log: > ulf> Add support for at91sam9g20 to U-Boot > > What's the upstream status of this patch? >