From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:21:14 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: argus bind dmraid kismet libeXosip2 ltra etc... In-Reply-To: <873af6d219.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <20090126003405.2EE7776D28@busybox.osuosl.org> <873af6d219.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <1232968874.2298.60.camel@elrond.atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net m?n 2009-01-26 klockan 07:17 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard: > >>>>> "ulf" == ulf writes: > > ulf> Author: ulf > ulf> Date: 2009-01-26 00:34:02 +0000 (Mon, 26 Jan 2009) > ulf> New Revision: 25041 > > ulf> Log: > ulf> Add help for packages without AVR32 support > Most of these indicate "Machine not recognized" I think one of them indicated something similar to "header"-.h not found. I consider them as totally broken for AVR32 until proven otherwise. I would prefer them to depend on !BR2_avr32 in the distribution (not the svn), but that is apparently not popular. Totally meaninless to even attempt to build a package if there is 0% of success. HCE wants it to be there in the hope of that someone will need the support on AVR32 so much that they will fix it, but the casual user should not include them and fail the build. BR Ulf Samuelsson > Do they all really NEED avr32 patches to build? Some of them atleast > doesn't seem to be very hardware specific. Do they all fail doing > build for avr32? Can you post snippets of the build logs? >