[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/dbus

[Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>]

s?n 2009-02-01 klockan 07:31 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au> writes:
> 
>  >> dbus: revert r25194 (Unbreak Peters 'fixes' to dbus for a second time)
>  >> 
>  >> It was a bogus revert.
> 
>  Hamish> Are we having fun yet?
> 
> Yeah, I know it's silly.
> 
> I know it's mainly a social problem, but to me it again shows the need
> from moving from the svn code ghetto approach to git's approach with
> patches to the list and finally pull requests to the maintainer.
> 
> E.G. get the code reviewed BEFORE it gets into the tree, and not
> afterwards.

?As long as you allow a commit to the main tree without
testing by others you will have a problem.

I have proposed to go to git, but that was not of interest
until the uclibc project did so.

I also proposed a method allowing commits which 
does not interfere with the main build, but that was also shot down,
I seem to remember that you claimed that this functionality
can be handled by svn and tags.

BR
Ulf Samuelsson

> 
> But let's discuss this after the release.
>