From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Microbit_Ubuntu Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:58:43 +1000 Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 released In-Reply-To: <877hmpv7km.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <877hmpv7km.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <1274986723.7293.8.camel@ubuntu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Peter, On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:43 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Hi, > > Buildroot 2010.05-rc3 is released - Go download it at: > > http://buildroot.net/downloads/buildroot-2010.05-rc3.tar.gz > > or > > http://buildroot.net/downloads/buildroot-2010.05-rc3.tar.bz2 > > Or get it from Git: > > git://git.buildroot.net/buildroot > > Please give it a spin and report any problems to the mailing list or bug > tracker. Many thanks to the people contributing to this release: > > git shortlog -s -n 2010.05_rc2.. > 49 Peter Korsgaard > 32 Thomas Petazzoni > 1 Baruch Siach > 1 Bj?rn Forsman > 1 H Hartley Sweeten > 1 Julien Boibessot > 1 Nick Leverton > 1 Yann E. MORIN > 1 cmchao > > Unless any big issues are found, expect the final 2010.05 release by the > end of the week - So please give it a good test. > > -- > Bye, Peter Korsgaard > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot While I started a clean install w/ ext toolchain (crosstool-ng -1.6.1), I noticed that menuconfig still has a snag in it when starting from scratch with config : When HAL is not used and ext toolchain selected, udev & hotplug are *not* displayed nor selected. busybox-show-others has to be enabled and they both have to be explicitly enabled from there. BR versions < 2009.11 turned 'em on when mdev was selected. Perhaps it's deemed that HAL should be selected, dunno. In any case, hotplug & udev should not be suppressed by SHOW_OTHERS, since even busybox-1.16.1 does NOT offer them... More feedback when I completely rebuild. PS : ct-ng only offers "linuxthreads". So are we supposed to use "stable/old" in BR or "new" (latter, I guess) ???? I seem to have had problems with that - invoking gdbserver prompts : "can't load libthread_db.so.1". This worked fine with internal toolchain... Anyone ? HTH Best regards, Kris