From: Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] libglib2: update to version 2.30.2
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:39:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330436399.2274.39.camel@sven> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87aa433l77.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 00:34 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Sven" == Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com> writes:
>
> Sven> Update to latest stable release and add a dependency on libffi which
> Sven> is needed by GObject.
>
> Looks like we'll need to fiddle with _CONF_ENV:
>
> checking for qsort_r... yes
> checking if qsort_r uses glibc compatible argument order... configure: error: in `/home/peko/source/buildroot/output/build/libglib2-2.30.2':
> configure: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling
> See `config.log' for more details
>
> This is default internal toolchain config, ARM A8.
I have just changed my buildroot environment to use the default uclibc
configuration and now the build of libglib2 fails (with your build fix
applied):
gqsort.c: In function 'g_qsort_with_data':
gqsort.c:65:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'qsort_r' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
The problem is that you we pass glib_cv_have_qsort_r=yes to the
configure script now. This is supposed to be only of relevance if we are
building for glibc. But the glib configure script looks like this:
dnl don't use AC_CHECK_FUNCS here, otherwise HAVE_QSORT_R will
dnl be automatically defined, which we don't want to do
dnl until we have checked this function is actually usable
AC_CHECK_FUNC([qsort_r])
# BSD has a qsort_r with wrong argument order
if test x$ac_cv_func_qsort_r = xyes ; then
AC_CACHE_CHECK([if qsort_r uses glibc compatible argument order],
glib_cv_have_qsort_r, [
AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
// [test program deleted]
}]])],[glib_cv_have_qsort_r=yes],[glib_cv_have_qsort_r=no])])
fi
if test x$glib_cv_have_qsort_r = xyes ; then
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_QSORT_R, 1, [Define to 1 if you have the 'qsort_r'
function])
fi
So in the end what is tested is the value of glib_cv_have_qsort_r. With
your fix this is now set even though uclibc does not provide qsort_r.
Regards,
Sven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-27 12:38 [Buildroot] update libglib2 and libsoup Sven Neumann
2012-02-27 12:38 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] gamin: fix compilation with glib 2.30 Sven Neumann
2012-02-27 12:38 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] libglib2: update to version 2.30.2 Sven Neumann
2012-02-27 23:34 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-02-28 13:39 ` Sven Neumann [this message]
2012-02-28 20:34 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-02-27 12:38 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] glib-networking: new package Sven Neumann
2012-02-27 12:38 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] libsoup: update to version 2.36.1 Sven Neumann
2012-02-28 8:22 ` [Buildroot] update libglib2 and libsoup Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330436399.2274.39.camel@sven \
--to=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox