From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:21:28 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] Confused by the <fenv> implementation,
	causing gsl build issues
In-Reply-To: <20121018154240.25b7a7e3@skate>
Message-ID: <13a751bd21c.19da.2760.rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 18 October 2012 15:42:40 Thomas Petazzoni 
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:10:19 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>
> > > uClibc provides a UCLIBC_HAS_FENV option that can be enabled on any
> > > architecture.
> >
> > Fenv is IIRC only implemented for i386.
>
> Ok, but then why it can be selected on other architectures, and why
> does it install <fenv.h> even on architectures where it is not
> supported?

Please provide patches to add minimal fenv support for the target(s) 
you are interested in.
TIA,


Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com