From: "Jörg Krause" <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Patchwork cleanup, week #22
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:20:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466940052.32055.17.camel@embedded.rocks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615215258.5e9e85a6@free-electrons.com>
On Mi, 2016-06-15 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 23:26:54 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>
> > If there is no interest shown in a given patch, either by the
> > original
> > contributor or by another Buildroot developer within the two weeks
> > time, I'll mark the patch as "Rejected" due to the lack of
> > interest.
> > I'm sending this e-mail on June 1st, so on June 15th, for the
> > patches
> > that have not seen any discussion or activity, I'll mark them as
> > Rejected.
>
> We are on June 15th.
>
> > Here is the list of week #22 :
> >
> > ?1/ package/libgpg-error: bump to version 1.21
> > ????http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/562100/
> >
> > ????I don't really have any comments, other than the fact that it
> > is
> > ????super annoying for a package with so many dependencies to start
> > ????having architecture dependencies. Could someone refresh and
> > ????validate this patch?
>
> I'm keeping this one around, since we really want to bump libgpg-
> error
> at some point.
Sorry for not taking part in the discussion yet! I suggest to put some
effort to find an upstreamable solution. As Yann has noted I did a
proposal to remove the architecture dependency. However, I do not
understand the concern of the maintainer about ABI compliance. There
was no reaction to my last mail whereupon I stopped working on this
issue for now.
Anyone else interested in helping to solve this issue?
Best regards
J?rg Krause
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-26 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 21:26 [Buildroot] Patchwork cleanup, week #22 Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-01 21:53 ` Peter Seiderer
2016-06-02 7:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-02 22:46 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-06-02 7:41 ` Jeroen Roovers
2016-06-02 7:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-02 8:24 ` Jeroen Roovers
2016-06-02 22:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-06-03 9:11 ` Yegor Yefremov
2016-06-03 19:55 ` Carlos Santos
2016-06-08 20:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-09 8:02 ` Romain Izard
2016-06-09 8:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-15 19:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-16 15:11 ` Carlos Santos
2016-06-26 11:20 ` Jörg Krause [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466940052.32055.17.camel@embedded.rocks \
--to=joerg.krause@embedded.rocks \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox