From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] qt5: Disable passing of -isystem flag in CXXFLAGS
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:54:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475052878.9922.15.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6467f1b7-7326-02f1-caf1-671099a34eac@mind.be>
Hi?Arnout,
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 00:33 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>
> On 26-09-16 13:30, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arnout,
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 00:11 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > >
> > > ?I still don't understand how the -I$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include gets added, by
> > > the way. Isn't pkg-config supposed to suppress those, because they already are
> > > in the default search path? For instance, on my system I have a xf86dgaproto.pc
> > > which contains Cflags: -I${includedir}, but pkg-config --cflags xf86dgaproto
> > > gives empty.
>
> ?I mean that it's _our_ pkg-config that does the wrong thing.
>
> ------ output/staging/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libpcre.pc --------
> # Package Information for pkg-config
>
> prefix=/usr
> exec_prefix=/usr
> libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
> includedir=${prefix}/include
>
> Name: libpcre
> Description: PCRE - Perl compatible regular expressions C library with 8 bit
> character support
> Version: 8.39
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lpcre
> Libs.private:
> Cflags: -I${includedir}
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> output/host/usr/bin/pkg-config --cflags libpcre
> -IXXX/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-musleabihf/sysroot/usr/include
>
> ?According to me, this should have returned empty.
>
> ?So I've checked, and it looks like this is a feature of the full-fledged
> pkg-config that pkgconf doesn't have:
>
> pkg-config --cflags libpcre
> <empty>
>
> output/host/usr/bin/pkgconf --cflags libpcre
> -I/usr/include
Well note in our case pkg-config is just a wrapper script
that is created out of BR's "package/pkgconf/pkg-config.in":
--------------------->8--------------------
cat ./output/host/usr/bin/pkg-config
#!/bin/sh
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=${PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-
uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/share/pkgconfig}
PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=${PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot} $(dirname
$0)/pkgconf??$@
--------------------->8--------------------
So it all boils down to:
1) "pkg-config" case:
--------------------->8--------------------
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=${PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/pkgconfig}
PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=${PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot}
./output/host/usr/bin/pkgconf --libs icu-i18n
-licui18n -L/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib -licuuc -licudata
--------------------->8--------------------
2. Pure "pkgconf" case:
--------------------->8--------------------
./output/host/usr/bin/pkgconf --libs icu-i18n
-licui18n -licuuc -licudata
--------------------->8--------------------
> ?So ideally, we should patch pkgconf (and send upstream) to remove the default
> search paths.
Given my comments above I'm not really sure it's pkgconf who's guilty.
Any thoughts?
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-23 14:58 [Buildroot] [PATCH] qt5: Disable passing of -isystem flag in CXXFLAGS Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-23 22:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-26 11:30 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-27 22:33 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-28 8:54 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-09-29 21:05 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-29 21:34 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-30 8:55 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-10-05 7:12 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-30 8:54 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-28 8:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-09-29 21:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-10-05 8:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475052878.9922.15.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox