Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] qt5: Disable passing of -isystem flag in CXXFLAGS
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:54:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475052878.9922.15.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6467f1b7-7326-02f1-caf1-671099a34eac@mind.be>

Hi?Arnout,

On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 00:33 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> 
> On 26-09-16 13:30, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Arnout,
> > 
> > On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 00:11 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> [snip]
> > 
> > > 
> > > ?I still don't understand how the -I$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include gets added, by
> > > the way. Isn't pkg-config supposed to suppress those, because they already are
> > > in the default search path? For instance, on my system I have a xf86dgaproto.pc
> > > which contains Cflags: -I${includedir}, but pkg-config --cflags xf86dgaproto
> > > gives empty.
> 
> ?I mean that it's _our_ pkg-config that does the wrong thing.
> 
> ------ output/staging/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libpcre.pc --------
> # Package Information for pkg-config
> 
> prefix=/usr
> exec_prefix=/usr
> libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
> includedir=${prefix}/include
> 
> Name: libpcre
> Description: PCRE - Perl compatible regular expressions C library with 8 bit
> character support
> Version: 8.39
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lpcre
> Libs.private:
> Cflags: -I${includedir}
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> output/host/usr/bin/pkg-config --cflags libpcre
> -IXXX/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-musleabihf/sysroot/usr/include
> 
> ?According to me, this should have returned empty.
> 
> ?So I've checked, and it looks like this is a feature of the full-fledged
> pkg-config that pkgconf doesn't have:
> 
> pkg-config --cflags libpcre
> <empty>
> 
> output/host/usr/bin/pkgconf --cflags libpcre
> -I/usr/include

Well note in our case pkg-config is just a wrapper script
that is created out of BR's "package/pkgconf/pkg-config.in":
--------------------->8--------------------
cat ./output/host/usr/bin/pkg-config
#!/bin/sh
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=${PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-
uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/share/pkgconfig}
PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=${PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot} $(dirname
$0)/pkgconf??$@
--------------------->8--------------------

So it all boils down to:
1) "pkg-config" case:
--------------------->8--------------------
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=${PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib/pkgconfig}
PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=${PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR:-/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot}
./output/host/usr/bin/pkgconf --libs icu-i18n
-licui18n -L/XXX/output/host/usr/arc-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/lib -licuuc -licudata
--------------------->8--------------------

2. Pure "pkgconf" case:
--------------------->8--------------------
./output/host/usr/bin/pkgconf --libs icu-i18n
-licui18n -licuuc -licudata
--------------------->8--------------------

> ?So ideally, we should patch pkgconf (and send upstream) to remove the default
> search paths.

Given my comments above I'm not really sure it's pkgconf who's guilty.

Any thoughts?

-Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-28  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-23 14:58 [Buildroot] [PATCH] qt5: Disable passing of -isystem flag in CXXFLAGS Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-23 22:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-26 11:30   ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-27 22:33     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-28  8:54       ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-09-29 21:05         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-29 21:34           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-09-30  8:55             ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-10-05  7:12               ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-30  8:54           ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-28  8:57       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-09-29 21:30         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-10-05  8:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1475052878.9922.15.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox