Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörg Krause" <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2017-01-24
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:14:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485429244.1041.1.camel@embedded.rocks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170126111125.f7snoblajixwt322@tarshish>

Hi Baruch,

On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 13:11 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Samuel Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:05:42PM +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 08:30 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > 
> > > > > Detail of failures
> > > > > ===================
> > > > > 
> > > > > ????????i586 |????????????????bctoolbox-0.4.0 | NOK | http://
> > > > > autobuil
> > > > > d.buildroot.net/results/4b4b00ad3b95ddacc9d5cc31c34e457ee55c9
> > > > > 364
> > 
> > Regarding this package, apologies I missed it during the initial
> > review :s
> > 
> > This build failure occurs because it goes in a path it should not.
> > In the Config.in: it is mentionned that mbedtls is prefered to
> > polarssl [1], hence the select [1] and the dependency in the *.mk
> > [2].
> > However, the cmake configure flags are not set accordingly to this,
> > and the defaults may play against us [3].
> > 
> > I would suggest to set the ENABLE_{MBEDTLS,POLARSSL} flags in the
> > *.mk first.
> > This should prevent from following this case [4], as displayed in
> > the
> > build log [5].
> > 
> > After this, if the CheckSymbolExists still causes error, we may
> > need
> > to patch the bctoolbox
> > cmake code to set/fix the variables used by CheckSymbolExists [6].
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this issue. Is it a rpath
> > > > issue? cmake
> > > > links a test program with host zlib:
> > 
> > Note: I'm not able to reproduce the error either.
> 
> Do you have a 32bit libz.so.1 in /usr/lib on your host machine?

I do have:

ls -l /usr/lib??/libz.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 15. Jan 20:46 /usr/lib32/libz.so.1 ->
libz.so.1.2.11*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 15. Jan 20:43 /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 ->
libz.so.1.2.11*

J?rg

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-25  7:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2017-01-24 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-01-25 21:05 ` Jörg Krause
2017-01-25 21:15   ` Baruch Siach
2017-01-26 11:04     ` Samuel Martin
2017-01-26 11:11       ` Baruch Siach
2017-01-26 11:14         ` Jörg Krause [this message]
2017-01-26 11:28           ` Baruch Siach
2017-01-29 20:37       ` Jörg Krause
2017-01-29 21:11         ` Baruch Siach
2017-01-30 19:59           ` Jörg Krause
2017-01-30 21:20             ` Baruch Siach
2017-01-30 21:22               ` Jörg Krause
2017-01-30 21:26                 ` Baruch Siach
2017-01-30 21:45                   ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-05 22:17                   ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-06 11:06                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-06 16:52                       ` Samuel Martin
2017-02-06 17:43                         ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-06 17:53                           ` Samuel Martin
2017-02-06 17:59                             ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-06 18:14                               ` Samuel Martin
2017-02-06 19:24                                 ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-06 21:12                                 ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-06 23:38                                 ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-07 11:28                                   ` Samuel Martin
2017-02-07 13:00                                     ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-07 13:29                                       ` Samuel Martin
2017-02-07 19:07                                         ` Jörg Krause
2017-02-09 20:02                                         ` Jörg Krause

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1485429244.1041.1.camel@embedded.rocks \
    --to=joerg.krause@embedded.rocks \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox