From: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] e2fsprogs: keep util-linux's fsck if chosen
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:36:41 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491100601-7867-1-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br> (raw)
Since e2fsprogs depends on util-linux, it's built after it. So you can't
have e2fsck from e2fsprogs along with the fsck wrapper from util-linux
(which is better maintained and compatible with systemd) because we end
up deleting the fsck from util-linux.
Fix this issue by disabling e2fsprogs' fsck if the one from util-linux
is selected.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinlian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
---
Changes v1->v2
- Add depenndece on !BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FSCK to
BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_FSCK
- Add comment telling that the fsck from util-linux has preference.
- Pass "--enable-fsck" conditionally to configure
- Remove the guard around the removal of /usr/sbin/fsck, since the
fsck from busybox and util-linux are installed at /sbin
- Improve comments and commit message
In the long run the e2fsprogs recipe deserves an extreme overhauling
like we did for util-linux but right now these changes are enough to
fix the specific problem of fsck.
---
package/e2fsprogs/Config.in | 4 ++++
package/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs.mk | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/e2fsprogs/Config.in b/package/e2fsprogs/Config.in
index d1914a9..418f877 100644
--- a/package/e2fsprogs/Config.in
+++ b/package/e2fsprogs/Config.in
@@ -59,8 +59,12 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_FILEFRAG
config BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_FSCK
bool "fsck"
+ depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FSCK
default y
+comment "the fsck from util-linux has preference over this one"
+ depends on BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FSCK
+
config BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_FUSE2FS
bool "fuse2fs"
depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS # libfuse
diff --git a/package/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs.mk b/package/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs.mk
index 3f235c5..b4b96c3 100644
--- a/package/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs.mk
+++ b/package/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs.mk
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ E2FSPROGS_LICENSE = GPL-2.0, BSD-3-Clause (libuuid), MIT-like with advertising c
E2FSPROGS_LICENSE_FILES = NOTICE lib/uuid/COPYING lib/ss/mit-sipb-copyright.h lib/et/internal.h
E2FSPROGS_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
E2FSPROGS_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf util-linux
-# we don't have a host-util-linux
+# We don't need host-util-linux, since we disable libblkid, libuuid.
HOST_E2FSPROGS_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
# e4defrag doesn't build on older systems like RHEL5.x, and we don't
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ E2FSPROGS_CONF_OPTS = \
$(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_DEBUGFS),,--disable-debugfs) \
$(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_E2IMAGE),,--disable-imager) \
$(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_E4DEFRAG),,--disable-defrag) \
+ $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_FSCK),--enable-fsck,) \
$(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_RESIZE2FS),,--disable-resizer) \
--disable-uuidd \
--disable-libblkid \
--disable-libuuid \
- --enable-fsck \
--disable-e2initrd-helper \
--disable-testio-debug \
--disable-rpath
@@ -146,10 +146,16 @@ E2FSPROGS_DEPENDENCIES += busybox
define E2FSPROGS_REMOVE_BUSYBOX_APPLETS
$(RM) -f $(TARGET_DIR)/bin/chattr
$(RM) -f $(TARGET_DIR)/bin/lsattr
- $(RM) -f $(TARGET_DIR)/sbin/fsck
$(RM) -f $(TARGET_DIR)/sbin/tune2fs
$(RM) -f $(TARGET_DIR)/sbin/e2label
endef
+
+ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS_FSCK),y)
+# We only build fsck if it's not selected in util-linux, so at this
+# point /sbin/fsck must have come from busybox.
+E2FSPROGS_REMOVE_BUSYBOX_APPLETS += $(RM) -f $(TARGET_DIR)/sbin/fsck
+endif
+
E2FSPROGS_PRE_INSTALL_TARGET_HOOKS += E2FSPROGS_REMOVE_BUSYBOX_APPLETS
endif
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-02 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-02 2:36 Carlos Santos [this message]
2017-04-02 10:13 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] e2fsprogs: keep util-linux's fsck if chosen Maxime Hadjinlian
2017-04-02 12:03 ` Carlos Santos
2017-04-02 12:10 ` Maxime Hadjinlian
2017-04-02 14:30 ` Carlos Santos
2017-04-02 14:38 ` Carlos Santos
2017-04-03 13:16 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491100601-7867-1-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br \
--to=casantos@datacom.ind.br \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox