From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/skeleton-systemd: invert factory logic
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 01:56:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520301393.25567.314.camel@impinj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd9e7fa23e9e4da9ccf59598d68413ba13cb00d3.1520183159.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
On Sun, 2018-03-04 at 18:06 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Currently, we handle the factory by redirectoring /var with a symlink at
> build time, and with some trickery during the filesystem generation,
> depending on whether we need to remount the filesystem read-write or
> not.
>
> However, this is causing wquite some pain with latest systemd, now that
> they have moved their dbus socket to /run instead of /var/run.
>
> As such, trying to play tricks with /var/run as a symlink is difficult,
> because at times it is in .usr/share/factory/var/run (during build) and
> then it is in /var/run (at runtime). So a relative symlink is not
> possible. But an absolute symlink is not possible either, because we are
> installing out-pf-tree.
The symlink does work ok if the patches to fix it are applied. Both
the build time ${TARGET_DIR}/var/run and run time /var/run work.
However...
> We fix all this mess by making /var a real directory from the onset, so
> that we can use the runtime-expected layout even during the build.
>
> Then, during filesystem generation, we move /var away to the factory,
> and populate it as we used to do. This still requires a post-fs hook to
> restore /var after the filesystem generation.
I think this a better way. It was I was alluding to on IRC as a system
that wasn't tied to work-arounds for specific directories in var. But
I was troubled by...
> This leaves a situation that, should the filesystem generation fails,
> /var will be left in an inconsistent state. But that is not worse than
> what we already had anyway.
I wondered if there was a way to get fakeroot to also "fake" the
movement of the files in addition to modification of owner and group,
but it appears there is not. I do not think it would be impossible for
fakeroot to gain this ability.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-04 17:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] package/systemd: unbreak a few stuf Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-04 17:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/skeleton-init-systemd: work around for /var/lib not populating Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-04 18:17 ` Adam Duskett
2018-03-04 20:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-04 20:29 ` Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-05 18:55 ` Trent Piepho
2018-03-04 17:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/skeleton-systemd: invert factory logic Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-06 1:56 ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2018-03-04 17:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] support/tests: enhance the runtime systemd tests Yann E. MORIN
2018-03-04 20:22 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] package/systemd: unbreak a few stuf Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520301393.25567.314.camel@impinj.com \
--to=tpiepho@impinj.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox