From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Laird Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/busybox In-Reply-To: <877iccn0ml.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <20080626065112.3F4CB3C289@busybox.net> <877iccn0ml.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <18151015.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net jacmet wrote: > >>>>>> "jacmet" == jacmet writes: > > jacmet> Author: jacmet > jacmet> Date: 2008-06-25 23:51:11 -0700 (Wed, 25 Jun 2008) > jacmet> New Revision: 22514 > > jacmet> Log: > jacmet> busybox: mark old versions as deprecated > > I would like to get rid of the ancient 1.2.1 .. 1.8 versions - Any > objections to me removing them completely? > > -- > Bye, Peter Korsgaard > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at uclibc.org > http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > > I use buildroot actively in my company and have kept up to date pretty well. However we are still using busybox 1.2.2.1 in some cases. Marking as deprecated is fine, removing completely would mean me having to hold local patches to keep the ability to upgrade buildroot yet not change busybox versions. So I vote for not removing just deprecating :-) Cheers Dan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/svn-commit%3A-trunk-buildroot-package-busybox-tp18127574p18151015.html Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.